Team Circle · The Measurement

For the first time, what changes is visible:
in numbers and by dimension, before and after.

The feedback is gathered from the people who lived it, a questionnaire and a conversation with each participant, and the complexity score tells us where things stand now. Everything comes together in a final report.
The distance between before and after is visible, real, demonstrable.

Shafts of light coming through the jungle canopy at Lunita

Not impressions. Not feedback in the heat of the moment.
A structured result that shows what changed, dimension by dimension, problem by problem.

No other corporate retreat starts from a diagnosis and measures the impact at thirty days and again at ninety.
It simply takes building everything (the analysis, the program, the ceremonies, the follow-up) as one coherent system. We did.

BEFORE THE RETREATThe analysis maps the situationThe problems emerge and are ranked by urgency and dimension. This becomes the blueprint of the retreat: not an impression, a data point.
DURING THE RETREATThe ceremonies generate the changeEach experience acts on the problems identified. The change happens during the retreat: in the ceremonies, in the relationships, in the moments of rupture and connection.
30 AND 90 DAYS AFTER THE RETREATThe same analysis, run again. Twice.The analysis you did at the start is the baseline: it's what makes everything after it readable. We run it again thirty days after you return, and once more at ninety. Same questions. Same people. Nothing changed. The moment you alter the instrument, the comparison stops meaning anything. That's why we don't send a satisfaction survey: a satisfaction survey measures how the week felt, and how the week felt is not the point. The two follow-ups don't measure the same thing. At thirty days: what moved. This is the reaction. People are back at their desks but the week is still close, and the effect is at its strongest. It answers two questions. Was the diagnosis right: did the ceremonies we chose actually reach the problem we identified? And what hasn't moved at all, while there's still time to do something about it? At ninety days: what stayed. This is retention. The momentum is gone, the routine is back, and whatever is still standing is structural. It's the only honest number, and it's the one we would want if we were you. And the distance between the two is a finding of its own. High at thirty and low at ninety doesn't mean the retreat failed. It means nothing was built to catch it afterwards, and it tells you exactly where to put that. Low at thirty and higher at ninety happens too, usually on trust, which moves slowly and doesn't announce itself. Three points make a curve. One makes a photograph, and a photograph taken a month out is taken while everyone is still glowing. What it's for. For you: knowing whether the investment produced anything, which problems actually shifted, and what to do next. For us: knowing which ceremonies hold up over three months and which don't. Every measurement goes back into the repertoire. It's why the map of problems and ceremonies keeps getting sharper, and why it's ours.
THE FINAL REPORTFrom the team's voice to a measured resultParticipants complete a specific post-retreat questionnaire. Individual interviews are conducted with those who took part. The results are aggregated anonymously, no individual data is ever exposed, and presented to company leadership in a structured report that compares the situation before and after the retreat, dimension by dimension, delivered within 10 working days.

And it doesn't end there. In Mexico, where the law asks you to run the assessment again every two years, we stay alongside you between one cycle and the next.